It was reported recently that Joe Biden was close to declaring a ” Climate Emergency”. What would this mean for the US and its citizens?
If he does this, he will gain 100 war time powers similar to the covid crisis or 911. He will gain the ability to bypass Congress and implement the New Deal provisions unfettered.
Including climate lockdowns, closing businesses, parks, and churches and forced public changes similar to martial law.
He can implement wide-ranging changings like banning events, gatherings, and usage of things like internal combustion vehicles. Gas stoves as well as all coal energy production facilities.
He could commendeer land that people are living on as (Public Domain) and force people to move off their lands. Close private farms and even build ( Smart Cities called 15 minute cities which would basically restrict the usage of vehicles to 15 minutes a day and restrict movement the rest of the time in the name of Climate Change).
Such cities would be monitored 24/7 through video surveillance monitored by Ai.
He could restrict food usage and availability forcing a curtailment or massive reduction in meat production. Or implementation of forced usage of lab grown meat. As well as the usage of GMO vegetables and fruits.
Theorically he could demand control of your heating/cooling of your homes through smart thermostats and other smart devices giving the government the power to limit the usage and the power to shut them off when they deem its required.
It’s possible they may, through smart power meters and other systems, limit your power usage as well limiting your power usage daily, shutting it off when they deem it is required.
They could limit your access to specific businesses, services, and products, including firearms, emergency food, or medical supplies.
The movement restrictions, as in the days of the pandemic, could be reimplimented as well as possible change to digital currency in the interest of gaining control over your access to goods and services.
Further, in the interest of maintaining compliance to Climate Change directives, a social credit score could be implemented. And through which further restrict your movement by making non-compliance with Climate Change mandates carry a punishment of not being able to purchase gasoline, or ride public transit, or restrict air travel.
It could also restrict your access to the internet. Declaring the need for a digital ID to track all your usage and activities online limited your freedom of speech and further controlling your daily activities.
Conclusion: The declaration of a climate emergency is tantamount to declaring martial law and, in so doing, would suspend the Constitution and, for all intents and purposes, remove freedom from the population. You would become slaves to the state.
This, in my opinion, is simply one more step toward achievement of the globalist agenda of depopulation, eliminating the current society.
As well as destruction of the economy and sovereignty of the US. And, it has become obvious that the Democratic as well as much of the Republican parties no longer represent the people who elected them.
Therefore, their purpose is simply to create and implement the agenda of the world Globalist here in the US.
As such, declaring a climate emergency by the Biden Administration is simply a means to that end. And one more step to accomplishment of the Globalist stated goals.
Category: Civilian Casualties
A Brief History of Communism In The 20th Century
Communism is an economic-political philosophy founded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 19th century. They wrote and published “The Communist Manifesto” in 1848, aiming to end capitalism, which they believed led to the exploitation of workers.
Marx and Engels envisioned a society where the means of production would belong to the entire community, abolishing all private ownership. Their slogan was that everyone would contribute according to their abilities and receive according to their needs.
Communist philosophy began to develop in Russia in the late 19th century, leading to the Bolsheviks seizing power through the October Revolution in 1917. They changed their name to the Communist Party and nationalized public property.
Joseph Stalin continued to lead the USSR with communist ideologies, extending the growth of communism in Russia and beyond. This example of communism influenced many countries, including China.
Communism as a political ideology advocates for state ownership of major resources in a society, aiming to eliminate the class system through equal redistribution of income and benefits of labor.
Karl Marx, known as the Father of Communism, proposed this ideology in his Communist Manifesto, emphasizing the importance of class struggle and critiquing capitalism’s instability.
The Communist Manifesto did not provide concrete instructions for setting up a communist government but influenced revolutionary industrial workers across Europe, leading to the rise of an international labor movement.
The early 19th century saw civil unrest in Europe as urban working-class individuals faced poor living conditions and saw stark inequalities between classes, fueling the appeal of communist ideas.
Marx envisioned communism as a global movement that would inspire and expedite working-class revolutions throughout the capitalist world, starting with the French revolutions of 1848.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 marked a significant turning point in the spread of communism, with the Bolsheviks establishing a communist government and nationalizing public properties.
The rise of the Soviet Union under Vladimir Lenin and later Joseph Stalin exemplified the application of communist ideologies on a large scale, shaping the economic and political landscape of the 20th century.
The Cold War between communist ideologies represented by the USSR and capitalist ideologies represented by the United States was a defining struggle of the 20th century, highlighting the tensions between the two systems.
Communism in China followed a similar trajectory, with the Communist Party gaining power and implementing communist policies to transform the economic structure of the country.
The principles of communism, including collective ownership of resources and equitable distribution of wealth, continue to shape political discourse and movements around the world.
The transition from capitalism to communism involves a process of class conflict and revolutionary struggle, with the goal of establishing a classless society where everyone’s needs are met.
The implementation of communism has varied in different countries, with some experiencing success in establishing socialist governments while others faced challenges in transitioning to a communist society.
The influence of communism extends beyond economic and social realms to cultural and philosophical domains, inspiring movements for social justice and equality.
Criticisms of communism often center on issues of individual freedom, state control, and economic inefficiencies, leading to debates about the feasibility and desirability of communist systems.
Despite its challenges and criticisms, communism remains a significant force in global politics and history, shaping the trajectory of nations and influencing ideological debates.
The history of communism reflects a complex interplay of ideas, movements, and historical events that have left a lasting impact on societies around the world, shaping the course of modern history.
Conclusion: This overview provides a glimpse into the rich and intricate history of communism, highlighting its evolution, challenges, and enduring relevance in the modern world.
Communism like Capitalism were two approaches to a social issue which gripped the world. The 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th centuries were plagued by massive poverty, starvation, and pestilence. This was due to overcrowding, poor living conditions and a scarcity of clean water, little food and unclean living conditions.
There were two distinct classes the wealthy and the poor. It was under these conditions that Socialism/Communism were born.
This was post feudal system, yet the wealthy saw them selves as aristocracy/noble born and the poor as nothing but slaves/the unwashed masses to be exploited for their enrichment.
They espoused Capitalism (Free Market Economy). Though it appeared free and to believe in individual liberty and personal property. The truth is that as long as you are wealthy, the system functions.
However, those who were in the lower class were little more than slaves. In the idea world Capitalism would have represented freedom. However, we live far from the ideal world.
Therefore, it was simply a change of definitions and titles. However, it was still the feudal system where the wealthy instead of having titles such as (Duke, Lord, Prince , or King was simply called Millionaires or later Billionaires).
Nothing in function had changed at all. In the middle 20th century, the middle class emerged, raising the working classes standard of living somewhat.
However, for the most part, nothing really has changed since the earlier eras. As such, capitalism could not fulfill its envisioned goals of universal financial freedom and the ownership of private property for all.
The wealthy maintained their domination of the majority of the wealth in society.
As such, it was out of this turmoil filled time that the idea of Socialism/Communism took root, especially among the lower working class.
As they struggled to eck out a meager existence working (slaving) in factories, in farms and on jobs owned by the wealthy.
Communism was the idea of communal property. Everything is owned not by a limited number of wealthy individuals. Rather, all property would be owned by all the people.
The Communist idea was this would be achieved through a people’s revolution. Where the workers would rise up and throw off the yolk of slavery to the wealthy and take back the means of creating their own destiny.
By doing this, give back all property to all the people instead of it being owned by a few at the top of society. With everybody receiving their fair share according to their need.
Again, in an ideal world, communal ownership and governance seem to be a good path to take. However, again, we don’t live in a. Ideal world.
How it played out in reality is the Communism became a weapon to be spread among the poor of a given country sewing the seeds of hope among the disenfranchised and lower class as a way for enemies to overthrow governments through violent revolution and uprisings.
Communism was also a failure, just like capitalism because both relied on this being an ideal world. And as we all are aware, we are far from living in an ideal world.
As such, due to greed, corruption, and psychopathic delusions of grandeur, the power hungry and opportunist used both ideologies to attempt world conquest leading to a very bloody and violent history spanning centuries.
Communism like Capitalism, was a failed ideology that led to nothing but misery and the death of millions of innocent people worldwide.
Israel’s Retaliation To Iran
Israel has now committed to retaliation to the Iranian rocket and drone attacks. The only problem is that, unlike Iran, Israel’s attack will likely be by aircraft. Further, it will be much more destructive.
The problem is first, how many civilians will be forced to suffer from their coming attack? This is not government versus government. This violence will always be foisted on the civilians of each country.
The issue is that the beginning of this path of violence may well have been a rogue assault of opportunity as I doubt that it was a sanctioned attack on the Iranian Syrian embassy.
Chances are this attack was precipitated upon finding out Iranian generals were present, and some Israeli commander stepped off the reservation to take unilateral action with authorization from his higher ups and not considering the ramifications of his actions.
As such, such an attack, of course, could not go unanswered, requiring Iran to act to save face. The US has asked Isreal not to retaliate to the face saving action by Iran.
If it stopped there, it would not interfere with overall globalist plans and objectives. However, now Isreal has pleaded that the face saving attack must be avenged, thus expanding the problem and further exacerbating an already tense and troubling issue.
If Isreal does as they have committed to pinpoint airstrikes that not only do extensive damage. But further cause loss of civilian lives. This could trigger a Brix treaty response, forcing a much wider conflict, possibly triggering a worldwide conflict.
The US, NATO, and possibly the UN might get involved if the Brix treaty is triggered by an Isreali attack on Iranian territory or assets. It’s just a guess at this point, however, while a World War may have been part of the Globalist agenda.
I doubt they were ready to pull the trigger on that particular event at this juncture . Thus, chances are they are busy behind the scenes attempting damage control and trying to calm nerves before this situation gets completely out of hand and can’t be easily reined in.
Conclusion: Though this hold chain of events may well have been some Isreali commanders’ wet dream.
The fact that now the Isreali government is not willing to at least candidly admit their people screwed up and are too busy Saber rattling rather than putting a cabosh on this unfolding drama says that perhaps old animosities are stronger than the Globalists control over the world governments.
This may well be an indication that the people of the world still have a chance to turn back and stop the globalists’ culling and conquest agenda before it reaches it ultimate end. Only time will tell.
Conspiracies and The Paradigm Shift 