The 3 World Wars Predicted by Albert Pike

Albert Pike was a prominent figure in American Freemasonry and is often associated with his alleged predictions regarding the occurrence of three world wars.

While some believe that Pike accurately predicted the events of the two World Wars, it is important to approach these claims with caution as there is significant debate and controversy surrounding them.

According to the alleged predictions, Pike supposedly wrote a letter in 1871 outlining a plan for three global conflicts that would reshape the world.

It is important to note that the authenticity of this letter is disputed, and some researchers argue that it may have been a fabrication or misinterpretation.

In the alleged letter, Pike purportedly outlined that the first world war would be sparked by conflicts between different European nations, leading to the downfall of several empires and the establishment of communism in Russia.

This prediction is seen by some as mirroring the events of World War I and the subsequent Russian Revolution.

The second world war, as predicted by Pike, would allegedly involve a clash between fascism and communism.

This conflict would result in the rise of a totalitarian global government, according to the alleged predictions.

While aspects of this prediction can be seen in the events of World War II, it is important to note that the historical context and motivations behind the war were complex and cannot be solely attributed to Pike’s alleged predictions.

The alleged third world war, according to Pike’s supposed predictions, would involve a conflict between the Western world, led by the United States, and the Islamic world.

This conflict would result in widespread destruction and chaos, ultimately leading to the emergence of a new world order.

It is important to approach this prediction with skepticism, as the dynamics and causes of potential future conflicts are uncertain and subject to numerous factors.

It is crucial to recognize that the alleged predictions attributed to Albert Pike have been widely debated and questioned by historians and researchers.

Many argue that the interpretation of Pike’s writings and the subsequent attribution of these predictions to him are based on speculation and conspiracy theories.

While Albert Pike was undoubtedly a significant figure in American Freemasonry, it is important to critically examine any claims or assertions regarding his predictions on world wars.

Historians and scholars rely on verifiable evidence and rigorous analysis to understand the past and make predictions about the future, and it is essential to approach such claims with a critical mindset.

Conclusion:  The alleged predictions attributed to Albert Pike regarding three world wars are a subject of debate and controversy.

While some see parallels between his supposed predictions and historical events, it is important to approach these claims with caution and critically evaluate the evidence and context surrounding them.

The study of history requires careful analysis and interpretation, and it is crucial to rely on verifiable sources and scholarly research when examining such claims.

Though there is some skeptism surrounding these predictions, what is important to understand is what this represents if genuine is evidence of how long and deep the globalist agenda truly is spanning decades if not centuries in the making.

Further, it demonstrates how interconnected all these groups and ideologies are and how they are being utilized as weapons of change to force the globalist end goals on the world.

It’s shows communism, radical Islam, and other ideologies are simply tools and means to an end to accomplish the globalists’ ultimate agenda of depopulation and the conquest of the planet.

A Question of Integrity

Question :  What would possess a globalist banking entity to issue a warning to the Biden Administration? 

Especially when it appears that the Biden Administration not only does whatever it’s told. 

Why would Globalists, through an organization they own, tell Biden to stop his constant uncontrolled spending, especially when one of their objectives is to destroy the US economy?

Perhaps Biden has overstepped his globalist directives.  It’s been apparent that both him and his family’s goals are to acquire as much money as possible.

Perhaps Bidens’ actions are rogue and unsanctioned by his globalist bosses.  It has become obvious that the globalist elites have no love for Joe Biden.   

Perhaps this warning coming so close in the wake of the NYT rebuke represents their displeasure for Biden and his recent problems that have been brought to light.

The continuation of both Joe Biden and his family’s pursuit of their own interests by way of supporting the Ukrainian war.

Simply for a reason of creating a situation that has the possibility of impropriety and money laundering is enough to gain the ire of the Globalist who allowed this conflict in the first place by their drawing attention not by doing what they said to do. 

But by getting wealthy through it and again draw unwanted attention that the Globalist neither want nor condone. 

Joe Biden may well have overstepped his authority and thereby draw attention to his actions and, by doing so, drew attention to the globalist agenda itself. 

Which the Globalist have gone to a monumental effort to hide from the general population.   Because, once the people see without a shadow of a doubt they are being manipulated, they will rebel.

Conclusion:  As such, it appears the Globalists have been quietly at first and now with increasing regularity and more and more publicly.  

Begun to addressing his improper behaviors with increasing occurrence.  They may attempt to completely replace him before the upcoming election and replace him with someone more controllable and less self-serving.

Nudge Teams Are Being Utilized By Governments To Control The Public Through Psychological Warfare, Mind Control, and Propaganda

The governments around the world have been using (Nudge Units) to wage psychological warfare on the population to make them do what they want them to do.

This is done through subliminal programming, peer pressure, and social engineering, making their point of view appear the only choice. 

Labeling all other perspectives as extreme, anti science, and even in some cases demonizing those viewpoints as well as those who hold those beliefs .

This tactic started decades ago covertly.  However, during the covid era, they utilized teams to actively promote the government narratives and, in the time of the pandemic, even demonize and silenced top doctors in the field for stating the truth versus the government narratives.

Even if the government narratives ran counter to logic, science, or rational thought.  For instance, banning people walking alone in forests, parks,beaches, or outdoor church services.  While protests by far left groups were perfectly acceptable and allowed.

These Nudge groups are currently attacking anyone who would point out the fact that the Climate Change Scheme has no basis in hard science.  But it is simply a method of wealth redistribution as well as control of the public.

They utilize front groups, protests, violence, public shaming, disinformation and misinformation as well as spokesmen that have no basis to speak on the topic except to use emotion as a way to control people’s perception as in their use of the school girl Greta Thumberg who had zero scientific background or credible data to back up her claims.

Since the executive orders signed by Barack Obama, propaganda was cleared to be used against the citizens in the governments quest to control the thought of the population.  These Nudge units have been created and used to push the chosen narrative.

Conclusion: The creation and use of Nudge teams is a direct violation of the Constitution.  Free speech is considered a liability to the overall globalist  agenda.  As such, every effort is being brought to bear to not only label any ideas that run counter to their narrative as (hate speech).  This nebulous label can be utilized to demonize and shut down any opinion they deem counter to their overall goals.

These Nudge teams are nothing more than the modern day equivalent to the Nazi Grey shirts who terrorized the citizens and pushed the state narrative.  Demonizing any idea that ran counter to that state narrative.   And was actively used to curtail free speech as counter to the public good, therefore (hate speech).

The New York Times Leaves the Reservation To Attack Biden Over MSM Avoidance

New York Times Leaves The Reservation To Attack Biden Over MSM Avoidance

Recently the NYT made a statement regarding the avoidance of Biden to do interviews with the MSM on his policies and selling out of the country to the Globalist.

This call out of the administration is either a one-off or perhaps a whistle-blower taking a chance to say what everybody else already knows.  

Or perhaps it’s a first step toward others standing up against the seditious activities of not only Biden but the Democratic Party as well. 

It is also evident that a portion or possibly more of the Republican Party is also complict in there seditious support of the globalist agenda in opposition of the Constitution and freedom in general.

The NYT has been a supporter of the government narrative.  As well as actively pushing wokism and the Marxist line. 

Communism has been a tool again Western society that has been utilized for decades by the Globalists in their relentless March toward their ultimate goals of depopulation and world domination.

The NYT has, like most of the MSM, always pushed the far Left ideology and repeatedly supporting globalism over the countries they were reporting on this, including the NYT historically. 

This is because most of the MSM both digital as well as hard copy is owned or directly controlled by billionaire Globalist elites.   Which makes them simply mouthpieces of the Globalist propaganda narrative.

This negative attack on Biden is departure from the standard propaganda message.   And as such is surprising in it occurrence.  As well as the possible causes and ramifications of such a public accusation against Biden directly.

Which could signal a number of possible scenarios.  Among which could be a lone disgruntled whistle-blower acting alone.  Or the beginning of a rebellion of reporters, perhaps realizing the dire position our country is facing.

Or perhaps it’s a sign that the Globalists see Biden as a liability to their overall agenda and perhaps are going to malign him either to bring in a different front man to carry on their agenda.

Or even they see the people waking up to their betrayal and have decided to allow Trump to take office for 4 years to calm down the public.  A public on the brink of violent revolution would run counter to their long-term plans.

The Globalist are not worried about short-term setbacks.   They are playing the long game confident that given time, they will achieve their ultimate goals. 

They just have to keep the population in the dark and pacified until they are ready to pull the trigger on they overall plans.  They just need to keep the public in the dark and believe that their threat is nothing but a (conspiracy theory).

As long as the people believe they have a choice and freedom, then they won’t rebel.  Even though their government no longer represents them nor has it for decades is irrelevant. 

Their elections are bogus and rigged.  Again irrelevant as long as they maintain the status quo until the moment they are ready to act.  The public will never realize they are nothing but unknowing slaves that are not only not free at all but all expendable.  Unaware sheep waiting on the slaughter.

Conclusion:  The NYT attack against Biden, though it appears as the first light shone on the seditious activity of the president and his avoidance of true damage, his policies and corruption have wrought on the country. 

This is at best suspect and, at worst, the first step to eliminate an asset that has ceased to be of use to his globalist masters.

A stand and watch mentality is needed to see where this action leads.  Whether it takes root, among other reporters, across the MSM landscape is left to be seen.

Or was it a one-off done by a disgruntled rogue who will be silenced is left to be seen.  One voice can be silenced.   A million can not so easily be removed.

In this case, only time will tell the direction this first salvo against Biden will take.  And whether it was an act of civil disobedience or the Globalists removing one puppet to replace him with another.

States Move To Counter Federal Government Sedition In Selling Out US Sovereignty To The WHO

The states have been utilizing the Constitutional authority to protect the rights of the people against an increasingly hostile and unresponsive federal government .

The actions taken by the Biden Administration have not only been counter to the obligations of the president to protect and defend the constitution, people, and country. But in fact, they have run counter to those duties.

It’s become obvious that the federal government no longer is acting as a representative of the people.  Rather, they are enforcing the agenda and dictates of the world Globalist elite.

Part of doing this is the elimination of US national sovereignty.  As such, if another disease were to create a pandemic, then through the WHO treaty, martial law could be declared, and US sovereignty could be handed over as part of the WHO treaty and reaction to that disease epidemic.

This treaty is a backdoor way to suspend the US Constitution as well as begin the culling of the US population.  

The forced relocation of the population to government controlled FEMA  concentration camps as acts to (quarantine) what disease they state they are responding to.

As such state governors are taking steps to bypass the federal governments betrayal of the Constitution and to block the implementation of such a treaty by putting in place state safeguards to protect the Constitutional rights of the people residing in those states.

Such protections are allowed as part of the states authority when the federal government can’t or won’t defend the Constitutional rights of its citizens.

Or the federal government acts in a way counter to the will of the people.  Which the signing of the WHO treaty surely represents.  A betrayal not only of their Oaths.  But also a betrayal of the US Constitution.

Conclusion:  The states not only have a duty to the Constitution.   But also a duty to protect the people when the federal government fails to do so.  Either by incompetence or sedition and treason.

What happens if Joe Biden Declares A “Climate Emergency”?

It was reported recently that Joe Biden was close to declaring a ” Climate Emergency”.  What would this mean for the US and its citizens?

If he does this, he will gain 100 war time powers similar to the covid crisis or 911.  He will gain the ability to bypass Congress and implement the New Deal provisions unfettered.

Including climate lockdowns, closing businesses, parks, and churches and forced public changes similar to martial law.

He can implement wide-ranging changings like banning events, gatherings, and usage of things like internal combustion vehicles.  Gas stoves as well as all coal energy production facilities.

He could commendeer land that people are living on as (Public Domain) and force people to move off their lands.  Close private farms and even build ( Smart Cities called 15 minute cities which would basically restrict the usage of vehicles to 15 minutes a day and restrict movement the rest of the time in the name of Climate Change).

Such cities would be monitored 24/7 through video surveillance monitored by Ai. 

He could restrict food usage and availability forcing a curtailment or massive reduction in meat production.  Or implementation of forced usage of lab grown meat.  As well as the usage of GMO vegetables and fruits.

Theorically he could demand control of your heating/cooling of your homes through smart thermostats and other smart devices giving the government the power to limit the usage and the power to shut them off when they deem its required.

It’s possible they may, through smart power meters and other systems, limit your power usage as well limiting your power usage daily, shutting it off when they deem it is required.

They could limit your access to specific businesses, services, and products, including firearms, emergency food, or medical supplies. 

The movement restrictions, as in the days of the pandemic, could be reimplimented as well as possible change to digital currency in the interest of gaining control over your access to goods and services.

Further, in the interest of maintaining compliance to Climate Change directives, a social credit score could be implemented.   And through which further restrict your movement by making non-compliance with Climate Change mandates carry a punishment of not being able to purchase gasoline, or ride public transit, or restrict air travel.

It could also restrict your access to the internet.  Declaring the need for a digital ID to track all your usage and activities online limited your freedom of speech and further controlling your daily activities.

Conclusion:  The declaration of a climate emergency is tantamount to declaring martial law and, in so doing, would suspend the Constitution and, for all intents and purposes, remove freedom from the population.   You would become slaves to the state.

This, in my opinion, is simply one more step toward achievement of the globalist agenda of depopulation, eliminating the current society. 

As well as destruction of the economy and sovereignty of the US.  And, it has become obvious that the Democratic as well as much of the Republican parties no longer represent the people who elected them.

Therefore, their purpose is simply to create and implement the agenda of the world Globalist here in the US.

As such, declaring a climate emergency by the Biden Administration is simply a means to that end.  And one more step to accomplishment of the Globalist stated goals.

Do Governments Have Culpability For The Unilateral Actions They Take?

The government of Dubai recently decided to take a unilateral action to start cloud seeding, and as such, it caused some destructive problems and ramifications.

The problem is that it didn’t just affect the government.   It represents a self-inflicted wound that could have been avoided by careful analysis and research as to the ramifications of their actions.

The unfortunate victims of their rash actions were destruction, a huge fiduciary expense, as well as the cost of human life.

However, what is moral and ethical responsibility that a government has to protect the governed and their wellbeing?

Does such a government have the right to act unilaterally either in declaring war or, in this case, taking an action that, in the long run, resulted in such dire consequences?

The government of Dubai by cloud seeding with careful research and analysis of the result wreaklessly caused destruction and severe bodily harm.  Should they be held responsible both legally and monetarily?

Conclusion:  For too long, politicians have thought they can simply act without being held accountable for the mayhem and dire consequences of their rash and sometimes life-threatening actions.

Whether it’s declaring war on another country.  Give vast sums to prolong such a conflict that results in massive bloodshed and loss of innocent life. 

Or, in this case, to unilaterally decide to wage weather modification.   Which by direct result cause massive destruction, financial liability, physical destruction, and loss of human life.

While governments are meant to represent the citizens for which they govern.  Do not morally or ethically have a right to just take actions that result in mass causalities or large-scale financial and physical loss. 

As such, those who engage in such rash and foolhardy actions without property research, thought, and consideration of the consequences should be held directly responsible for the ramifications of such poor decisions . 

By loss of position and possibly legal and financial consequences of poorly conceived and executed actions.

Thereby, making politicians aware their actions have consequences and perhaps putting in place checks and balances to prevent premature or ill thought out actions that put the country and its people in direct peril.