The 3 World Wars Predicted by Albert Pike

Albert Pike was a prominent figure in American Freemasonry and is often associated with his alleged predictions regarding the occurrence of three world wars.

While some believe that Pike accurately predicted the events of the two World Wars, it is important to approach these claims with caution as there is significant debate and controversy surrounding them.

According to the alleged predictions, Pike supposedly wrote a letter in 1871 outlining a plan for three global conflicts that would reshape the world.

It is important to note that the authenticity of this letter is disputed, and some researchers argue that it may have been a fabrication or misinterpretation.

In the alleged letter, Pike purportedly outlined that the first world war would be sparked by conflicts between different European nations, leading to the downfall of several empires and the establishment of communism in Russia.

This prediction is seen by some as mirroring the events of World War I and the subsequent Russian Revolution.

The second world war, as predicted by Pike, would allegedly involve a clash between fascism and communism.

This conflict would result in the rise of a totalitarian global government, according to the alleged predictions.

While aspects of this prediction can be seen in the events of World War II, it is important to note that the historical context and motivations behind the war were complex and cannot be solely attributed to Pike’s alleged predictions.

The alleged third world war, according to Pike’s supposed predictions, would involve a conflict between the Western world, led by the United States, and the Islamic world.

This conflict would result in widespread destruction and chaos, ultimately leading to the emergence of a new world order.

It is important to approach this prediction with skepticism, as the dynamics and causes of potential future conflicts are uncertain and subject to numerous factors.

It is crucial to recognize that the alleged predictions attributed to Albert Pike have been widely debated and questioned by historians and researchers.

Many argue that the interpretation of Pike’s writings and the subsequent attribution of these predictions to him are based on speculation and conspiracy theories.

While Albert Pike was undoubtedly a significant figure in American Freemasonry, it is important to critically examine any claims or assertions regarding his predictions on world wars.

Historians and scholars rely on verifiable evidence and rigorous analysis to understand the past and make predictions about the future, and it is essential to approach such claims with a critical mindset.

Conclusion:  The alleged predictions attributed to Albert Pike regarding three world wars are a subject of debate and controversy.

While some see parallels between his supposed predictions and historical events, it is important to approach these claims with caution and critically evaluate the evidence and context surrounding them.

The study of history requires careful analysis and interpretation, and it is crucial to rely on verifiable sources and scholarly research when examining such claims.

Though there is some skeptism surrounding these predictions, what is important to understand is what this represents if genuine is evidence of how long and deep the globalist agenda truly is spanning decades if not centuries in the making.

Further, it demonstrates how interconnected all these groups and ideologies are and how they are being utilized as weapons of change to force the globalist end goals on the world.

It’s shows communism, radical Islam, and other ideologies are simply tools and means to an end to accomplish the globalists’ ultimate agenda of depopulation and the conquest of the planet.

Antisemitism: Folstered By The Globalist Elite

Since the onset of the current conflict between Isreal and Palestine in the West Bank, the occurrences of Antisemitism has been on the increase.

The question of whether this is a grassroots occurrence or something that was manufactured on purpose by the Globalists to foster further amity in the US and abroad to weaken social bonds as well as damage US sovereignty is unknown by suspect given their penchant for psychological operations as well as their fostering of propaganda.

It appears that through a combination of unfettered invasion by radical Islamic sympathizers and a push by Globalists Like Soros and Schwab they have fostered animosity toward Isreal and the Jews especially in the US on college campuses and at the Capital.

With their ongoing desire to eliminate the national sovereignties of all the countries of the West.  It’s not surprising that they would utilize their stealth soldiers as a socially disruptive force against the Jewish people as the portrayal of them as the aggressor in the current conflict.

Whereas the current crisis there is not a war between peoples.  Rather, it is a created conflict between governments that rather than an opposition that couldn’t find a peaceful resolution.  Was a manufactured event created, planned, and orchestrated, not by the two governments. 

It was planned and financed as a means to an end by the world’s globalist elite in a further effort to push forward their plan to cause further social disruption and a permanent elimination of national sovereignty.

Who are the victims of this manufactured event?  Not the countries that staged the event.  But rather, the innocent civilians who have been brutalized, raped, ravaged, and killed as well as displaced from their homes.

And why, you ask?  Well, it is a cruel scheme to act as a smoke screen and catalyst for the narrative of  forced immigrant migration. 

A narrative they use to hide the movement of their UN , Brix treaty stealth soldiers into the Western countries to begin their assault on the economies, sovereignties and societies in preparation for their destruction to make way for the creation of the Globalist one world totalitarian government.

Conclusion:  The current rash of antisemitism being folstered and put on display is being manufactured and utilized as simply one more act by the Globalists to destabilize, demoralize and hopefully destroy the social bonds of the Western countries in a bid to eliminate national sovereignties.

The Illuminati And It’s Connections To Other Secret Societies As Well As The Globalist Elite

The Illuminati, also known as the Bavarian Illuminati, was a secret society founded on May 1, 1776, by Adam Weishaupt, a professor of canon law in Bavaria, Germany.

Weishaupt founded the Illuminati with the goal of promoting Enlightenment ideals, including reason, secularism, and the separation of church and state.

The name “Illuminati” comes from the Latin word “illuminatus,” which means “enlightened.” Members of the Illuminati considered themselves enlightened thinkers who sought to spread knowledge and promote social change.

The Illuminati’s organizational structure was based on secret societies such as the Freemasons, with ranks, rituals, and symbols designed to create a sense of mystery and exclusivity.

The Illuminati’s goals included influencing political and social change, promoting equality and democracy, and combating religious influence in government and society.

In its early years, the Illuminati attracted influential members from various backgrounds, including intellectuals, politicians, and artists.

The Illuminati’s influence grew rapidly, spreading across Europe and attracting thousands of members from diverse social and cultural backgrounds.

The Illuminati’s secrecy and reputation for subversive activities led to fear and suspicion from governments and religious authorities, who viewed the society as a threat to their power and influence.

In 1785, the Bavarian government, under pressure from the Catholic Church and other conservative forces, banned the Illuminati and launched a campaign to suppress the society.

Despite the government’s efforts to dismantle the Illuminati, society continued to exist in secret, with some members going underground and others forming new secret societies inspired by its teachings.

Over the years, various conspiracy theories have emerged linking the Illuminati to world events, suggesting that the society continues to exert influence over governments, banks, and other institutions.

While the historical Illuminati ceased to exist as a formal organization in the late 18th century, its legacy lives on in popular culture and conspiracy theories that continue to fascinate and intrigue people around the world.

Some believe that the Illuminati’s influence can still be felt in contemporary society, with secret societies and shadowy elites allegedly pulling the strings behind the scenes.

Critics of conspiracy theories about the Illuminati argue that they are based on little evidence and contribute to a climate of fear, mistrust, and paranoia.

Despite the lack of concrete proof linking the Illuminati to world events, the society’s legacy of promoting Enlightenment ideals continues to resonate with those who value reason, liberty, and social progress.

The Illuminati remains a symbol of defiance against authority, a beacon of intellectual curiosity, and a reminder of the power of ideas to shape history and society.

Conclusion:  The Illuminati’s origin and history are shrouded in mystery, myth, and controversy, making it a fascinating subject of study and speculation for centuries to come.

Though it was originally founded in 1776.  The secret society existed long before that with connections to the nobility in Europe and elsewhere.  

As well as purportedly being connected to other secret societies such as the Freemasons, Skull and Bones, as well as many Babylonian death Cults. 

And, most of the leaders of the world are said to be secret members .  As well as the world’s wealthy elite.  Many Death and Demon worshipping, Cults  as well as even cannibalistic Cults are said to be either directly connected or affiliated with the Illuminati in the modern era.

Though the Illuminati has maintained a low profile using front groups to represent its interests.   Which in my opinion, are one and the same with the Globalist. 

That is ultimately world depopulation and the creation of a one world totalitarian government.   And enslavement of the population that survives the world culling.

The Reasons For The Fall Of The Roman Empire And The Parallels To The Current Day US

Barbarian Invasions: The constant invasions by various Germanic tribes such as the Visigoths, Vandals, and Ostrogoths weakened the empire’s ability to defend its borders effectively.

Weak Military: Over time, the Roman army became less disciplined and less effective, making it easier for invading forces to penetrate Roman territories.

Political Instability: The Roman Empire experienced frequent changes in leadership, with emperors often being assassinated or overthrown, leading to instability and power struggles.

Economic Decline: The empire faced economic challenges such as inflation, high taxes, and devaluation of currency, which weakened the economy and led to widespread poverty.

Social Decay: The gap between the rich and the poor widened, leading to social unrest and discontent among the lower classes.

Overexpansion: The Roman Empire grew too large to be effectively governed, leading to difficulties in maintaining control over distant territories.

Administrative Corruption: Corruption and bureaucracy within the Roman government led to inefficiency and mismanagement of resources.

Decline in Morale: The once proud and disciplined Roman citizens lost their sense of civic duty and became apathetic towards the state.

Religious Strife: Religious conflicts and sectarianism, particularly between paganism and Christianity, divided the empire and weakened its unity.

Military Overextension: The Roman Empire stretched its military resources thin by fighting wars on multiple fronts, leading to exhaustion and depletion of manpower.

Loss of Civic Virtue: The traditional Roman values of duty, honor, and civic responsibility eroded over time, leading to a decline in the strength of the empire.

Environmental Factors: Natural disasters such as droughts, plagues, and famines further weakened the empire’s stability and ability to recover from external threats.

Decline in Agriculture: The Roman Empire struggled with agricultural productivity due to soil exhaustion, leading to food shortages and economic hardship.

Decline of Trade: The disruption of trade routes and decline of commerce weakened the economy and deprived the empire of vital resources.

Cultural Decay: The decline of intellectual and artistic achievements in the Roman Empire reflected a broader decay in the empire’s vitality and creativity.

Military Reforms: The Roman military underwent significant reforms in response to the changing nature of warfare, but these reforms were not implemented effectively or efficiently.

Division of the Empire: The division of the Roman Empire into Western and Eastern halves weakened its overall unity and made it more vulnerable to external threats.

Leadership Failures: Weak and ineffective emperors failed to provide the strong leadership needed to address the challenges facing the empire.

Decline in Innovation: The Roman Empire saw a decline in technological and scientific innovation, which limited its ability to adapt to changing circumstances.

Inability to Adapt: Ultimately, the Roman Empire failed to adapt to the complex challenges it faced, leading to its gradual decline and eventual collapse.

Conclusion:  As is evident about the parallels between the fall of Rome and the current situation in the US, the obvious similarities are startling.  Almost point for point the the conditions that caused the end of the Roman empire and the modern day situations happening in the United States are identical.

It makes one wonder if these conditions were recreated on purpose to destroy the US as they did 2000 years ago in Rome.

The Globalist have the stated goal of eliminating all the current countries in favor of a one world totalitarian regime.   As such, it is obvious the reasons for the  current situations that are occurring in the US.

And proves the old adage :  (If we do not learn from the lessons of the past, we are damned to repeat them).

Eugenics at the end of the 19th century And In The 20th century

Eugenics, a term coined by Francis Galton in the late 19th century, is the study of improving the genetic composition of the human population through selective breeding and other interventions. At the end of the 19th century and throughout the 20th century, eugenics gained popularity as a scientific and social movement with proponents believing that the human race could be improved by controlling who had children.

In the late 19th century, eugenics was seen as a means to address social problems such as crime, poverty, and mental illness. Advocates argued that by controlling reproduction, society could rid itself of undesirable traits and promote characteristics deemed favorable. This belief led to the establishment of eugenics programs in several countries, including the United States, Germany, and Sweden.

One of the most notable figures in the history of eugenics was Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton’s work on heredity and human intelligence laid the groundwork for the eugenics movement. He believed that human qualities were inherited and that by encouraging the reproduction of individuals with desirable traits and discouraging those with undesirable traits, society could be improved.

The early 20th century saw a rise in eugenics advocacy, with organizations like the Eugenics Record Office in the United States and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics in Germany leading the way in research and policy development. These organizations collected data on family pedigrees, conducted research on hereditary traits, and lobbied for eugenic policies.

One of the most infamous examples of eugenics in the 20th century is the forced sterilization programs that took place in several countries, including the United States, Canada, and Sweden. These programs targeted individuals deemed “unfit” for reproduction, including people with mental illnesses, disabilities, and criminal backgrounds. By the mid-20th century, tens of thousands of individuals had been sterilized against their will in the name of eugenics.

The eugenics movement also had a significant impact on immigration policy in several countries. In the United States, for example, the Immigration Restriction League advocated for stricter immigration laws based on eugenic principles. The 1924 Immigration Act, which imposed racial quotas on immigrants, was influenced by eugenic ideas about preserving the genetic purity of the American population.

Despite its popularity in the early 20th century, eugenics fell out of favor after World War II due to its association with Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. The atrocities committed by the Nazis, including the forced sterilization and extermination of millions of people deemed “undesirable,” discredited eugenics as a legitimate scientific and social movement.

In the aftermath of World War II, many countries abandoned eugenic policies and laws, and the movement lost its mainstream support. Today, eugenics is widely regarded as a pseudoscience with dangerous implications for human rights and social justice. However, some of its ideas continue to influence debates on genetics, bioethics, and reproductive technologies.

Conclusion, eugenics was a prominent social and scientific movement at the end of the 19th century and throughout the 20th century. It aimed to improve the genetic quality of the human population through selective breeding and other interventions. Despite its initial popularity, eugenics fell out of favor after World War II due to its association with Nazi atrocities. Today, eugenics is considered a discredited and harmful pseudoscience with no place in modern society.

Eugenics was a scientific method to justify racism, and the idea of eliminating the poor, physically or mentally disabled.  And the idea that the white race was the dominate or (master) race.

This type of thinking was also called Social Darwinism.  Hitler used drew from the idea of Eugenics to create his idea of the creation of the blonde haired, blue eyed white  master race.

Some notable supporters were Margret Sanger the founder of Planned Parenthood , Theodore Roosevelt and biologist
C.B. Davenport.   Adolf Hitler was a avid supporter of Margret Sanger and Eugenics.

A Short Summery of Socialism in Great Britain at The End of The 19th Century and Beginning Of The 20th Century

The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw a significant rise in socialist thought and activity in Great Britain, driven by social and economic inequalities resulting from the Industrial Revolution.

Key figures like Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels laid the groundwork for socialist ideas, advocating for the rights of the working class and the redistribution of wealth in society.

The Fabian Society, founded in 1884, became a prominent socialist organization in Britain, promoting gradual social reform rather than revolutionary change.

The rise of trade unions in the late 19th century also played a significant role in advancing socialist ideals, as workers fought for better wages, working conditions, and collective bargaining rights.

The Labour Party, established in 1900, emerged as a political force representing the interests of the working class and advocating for socialist policies such as nationalization of industries and social welfare programs.

The publication of important works like “The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists” by Robert Tressell in 1914 helped raise awareness about the struggles of working-class individuals in a capitalist society.

The period also saw the growth of socialist newspapers and journals, such as the “Daily Herald” and the “Labor Leader,” which disseminated socialist ideas and news to a wider audience

The Russian Revolution of 1917 had a profound impact on socialist movements in Britain, inspiring some to adopt more radical socialist ideologies akin to those of the Bolsheviks.

The aftermath of World War I brought economic turmoil and social unrest, leading to increased support for socialist policies as people sought solutions to widespread poverty and inequality.

Socialists in Britain at this time often clashed with conservative forces who resisted efforts to implement socialist reforms, leading to political tensions and social divisions.

The General Strike of 1926, organized by trade unions in response to wage cuts and poor working conditions, highlighted the ongoing struggles between workers and employers in Britain.

The Great Depression of the 1930s further exacerbated economic hardships, fueling support for socialist ideas that promised a more equitable distribution of wealth and resources.

Socialist intellectuals like George Bernard Shaw and H.G. Wells continued to advocate for socialist principles through their writings and public speeches, influencing public opinion on social issues.

The establishment of social welfare programs such as the National Health Service in 1948 marked a significant victory for socialist forces in Britain, providing universal healthcare for all citizens.

The post-World War II period witnessed the nationalization of key industries such as coal, steel, and transportation under the Labor government, reflecting a growing acceptance of socialist economic policies.

However, the Cold War and the rise of anti-communist sentiment in the West also posed challenges for socialist movements in Britain, as they faced accusations of being sympathetic to Soviet-style communism.

The New Left movement of the 1960s sought to revitalize socialist thought in Britain, focusing on issues like civil rights, feminism, and environmentalism in addition to traditional class-based struggles.

The election of the first labor government under Clement Attlee in 1945 marked a significant milestone for socialism in Britain, leading to the implementation of major social reforms and the welfare state.

Despite facing opposition from conservative forces and enduring internal divisions, socialist ideals continued to shape political discourse and policymaking in Britain throughout the 20th century.

Conclusion: Today, socialist principles remain influential in British politics, as evidenced by the continued support for policies such as universal healthcare, workers’ rights, and income redistribution.

A Brief History of Communism In The 20th Century

Communism is an economic-political philosophy founded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 19th century. They wrote and published “The Communist Manifesto” in 1848, aiming to end capitalism, which they believed led to the exploitation of workers.

Marx and Engels envisioned a society where the means of production would belong to the entire community, abolishing all private ownership. Their slogan was that everyone would contribute according to their abilities and receive according to their needs.

Communist philosophy began to develop in Russia in the late 19th century, leading to the Bolsheviks seizing power through the October Revolution in 1917. They changed their name to the Communist Party and nationalized public property.

Joseph Stalin continued to lead the USSR with communist ideologies, extending the growth of communism in Russia and beyond. This example of communism influenced many countries, including China.

Communism as a political ideology advocates for state ownership of major resources in a society, aiming to eliminate the class system through equal redistribution of income and benefits of labor.

Karl Marx, known as the Father of Communism, proposed this ideology in his Communist Manifesto, emphasizing the importance of class struggle and critiquing capitalism’s instability.

The Communist Manifesto did not provide concrete instructions for setting up a communist government but influenced revolutionary industrial workers across Europe, leading to the rise of an international labor movement.

The early 19th century saw civil unrest in Europe as urban working-class individuals faced poor living conditions and saw stark inequalities between classes, fueling the appeal of communist ideas.

Marx envisioned communism as a global movement that would inspire and expedite working-class revolutions throughout the capitalist world, starting with the French revolutions of 1848.

The Russian Revolution of 1917 marked a significant turning point in the spread of communism, with the Bolsheviks establishing a communist government and nationalizing public properties.

The rise of the Soviet Union under Vladimir Lenin and later Joseph Stalin exemplified the application of communist ideologies on a large scale, shaping the economic and political landscape of the 20th century.

The Cold War between communist ideologies represented by the USSR and capitalist ideologies represented by the United States was a defining struggle of the 20th century, highlighting the tensions between the two systems.

Communism in China followed a similar trajectory, with the Communist Party gaining power and implementing communist policies to transform the economic structure of the country.

The principles of communism, including collective ownership of resources and equitable distribution of wealth, continue to shape political discourse and movements around the world.

The transition from capitalism to communism involves a process of class conflict and revolutionary struggle, with the goal of establishing a classless society where everyone’s needs are met.

The implementation of communism has varied in different countries, with some experiencing success in establishing socialist governments while others faced challenges in transitioning to a communist society.

The influence of communism extends beyond economic and social realms to cultural and philosophical domains, inspiring movements for social justice and equality.

Criticisms of communism often center on issues of individual freedom, state control, and economic inefficiencies, leading to debates about the feasibility and desirability of communist systems.

Despite its challenges and criticisms, communism remains a significant force in global politics and history, shaping the trajectory of nations and influencing ideological debates.

The history of communism reflects a complex interplay of ideas, movements, and historical events that have left a lasting impact on societies around the world, shaping the course of modern history.

Conclusion: This overview provides a glimpse into the rich and intricate history of communism, highlighting its evolution, challenges, and enduring relevance in the modern world.

Communism like Capitalism were two approaches to a social issue which gripped the world.  The 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th centuries were plagued by massive poverty, starvation, and pestilence.   This was due to overcrowding, poor living conditions and a scarcity of clean water, little food and unclean living conditions.

There were two distinct classes the wealthy and the poor.  It was under these conditions that Socialism/Communism were born. 

This was post feudal system, yet the wealthy saw them selves as aristocracy/noble born and the poor as nothing but slaves/the unwashed masses to be exploited for their enrichment.

They espoused Capitalism (Free Market Economy).  Though it appeared free and to believe in individual liberty and personal property.  The truth is that as long as you are wealthy, the system functions. 

However, those who were in the lower class were little more than slaves.  In the idea world Capitalism would have represented freedom.  However, we live far from the ideal world.

Therefore, it was simply a change of definitions and titles.  However, it was still the feudal system where the wealthy instead of having titles such as (Duke, Lord, Prince , or King was simply called Millionaires or later Billionaires).

Nothing in function had changed at all.  In the middle 20th century, the middle class emerged, raising the working classes standard of living somewhat. 

However, for the most part, nothing really has changed since the earlier eras.  As such, capitalism could not fulfill its envisioned goals of universal financial freedom and the ownership of private property for all. 

The wealthy maintained their domination of the majority of the wealth in society.

As such, it was out of this turmoil filled time that the idea of Socialism/Communism took root, especially among the lower working class. 

As they struggled to eck out a meager existence working (slaving) in factories, in farms and on jobs owned by the wealthy.

Communism was the idea of communal property.  Everything is owned not by a limited number of wealthy individuals.  Rather, all property would be owned by all the people.

The Communist idea was this would be achieved through a people’s revolution.  Where the workers would rise up and throw off the yolk of slavery to the wealthy and take back the means of creating their own destiny.

By doing this, give back all property to all the people instead of it being owned by a few at the top of society.  With everybody receiving their fair share according to their need.

Again, in an ideal world, communal ownership and governance seem to be a good path to take.  However, again, we don’t live in a. Ideal world. 

How it played out in reality is the Communism became a weapon to be spread among the poor of a given country sewing the seeds of hope among the disenfranchised and lower class as a way for enemies to overthrow governments through violent revolution and uprisings.

Communism was also a failure, just like capitalism because both relied on this being an ideal world.  And as we all are aware, we are far from living in an ideal world.

As such, due to greed, corruption, and psychopathic delusions of grandeur, the power hungry and opportunist used both ideologies to attempt world conquest leading to a very bloody and violent history spanning centuries.

Communism like Capitalism, was a failed ideology that led to nothing but misery and the death of millions of innocent people worldwide.  

The Difference Between Communism and Capitalism

The interesting thing is Communism represents the idea of everybody sharing everything at its most pristine and pure form it’s no personal property.

Idea is everything is owned by everybody.  However, due to human nature, this ideology is impossible.   As such, an elite group is generally uses this ideology to steal everything for the few at the top.

And, then punish everyone else, causing two classes, the extremely rich and powerful at the top.  And the extremely poor and powerless at the bottom. 

The elite uses the ideal as a motivation for the poor to take everything from other wealthy .  It becomes a vicious circle of violence and rebellion.

Strangely enough Capitalism, though it touts the idea anyone can be wealthy and part of the elite and rich.  What actually occurs is it devolves into 3 classes that, through taxation and outright theft, creates to classes the wealthy elite and powerful.  And the poor and powerless. 

The wealthy use the poor as soldiers to steal the wealth from other wealthy individuals, thus causing this to devolve into a vicious circle as well.

And though capitalism was supposed to be the pinnacle of the individual success and get rich story.  The truth is that it’s as much an impossibility as the Communist ideal.

Thus, at their core, both ideologies, though they have Nobel aspirations.   Neither ideology can in the current world with flawed humans succeed.  Both are failures.  And both are doomed to the scrap heap of useless ideas.

Conclusion: The true fate of humanity must be beyond either ideology.   It must begin as a universal field of thought in which all people can thrive together without greed, desire for power over others, or the desire to put people down in order for you yourself to succeed.

Only then can we truly come together and ultimately live as one people in harmony with each other and the environment in universal brotherhood.

Geoengineering and the Elimination of Private Farming

Chemtrailing, space shields to block sunlight and cloud seeding, and use of haarp to heat the atmosphere to change the  weather, all they say are in the name of climate change.

However, the actual reason behind this is more insidious in that it is a concerted effort to curtail private farming and to pollute the atmosphere to help depopulate the planet.

While in a more conspiracy theoretical light, they have reported extraterrestrial and extra dimensional entities are terraforming the planet to make it more compatible to them physically.

Whichever eventuality is true, the fact is they are changing the earth’s atmosphere to make it less conductive to human life.

The Globalist have made a major effort to push their agenda forward, and their main tenet is depopulation.   As such, changing  the earth’s atmosphere  to make it incompatible to human life. 

There is no logical reason to terraform the earth, making it incompatible to human life unless they want to kill humanity.  Change the earth’s atmosphere for some other species or race of beings.  Or they are just truly psychopaths and intent on eliminating all life on this planet.

Conclusion: To eliminate vegetation and food production on a planetary scale can only have a couple of purposes.  Either to eliminate current life on this planet.  Or to terraform the earth for some other species.

The WHO Is Trying To Force Member Countries To Sign The Treaty That Will Sign Over National Sovereignty.

The WHO is now on a mission to force member nations to sign the treaty that will effectively end the national sovereignty of all member states in the event of another pandemic . 

The question is, why?  Why so eager to force an agreement unless they themselves plan if either taking part  in a release of the disease.  Or they are aware and being directed by those who will release it.

They have been trumpeting about disease X for some time now.  Since the official end of the Covid scare .  Which was a control release the last time.

So, knowing the last pandemic  was a controlled orchestrated event .  It’s not a big stretch that the next will also be masterminded by the same psychopaths who released the last one, namely the Globalists.

In their rush toward achieving their goal of world depopulation, they have now created a better bioweapon in the Avian Influenza or more commonly known as the bird flu.

This weaponized version is perhaps much more virulent than the past strains have been released, and it even now begins its path toward infecting the globe.

As such, armed with this information, the WHO has set out to force compliance with their farcical treaty to eliminate national sovereignty in the name of public health.

However in reality it only speeds up the time table toward disarming and culling the planet by enabling member states to declare martial law in a epidemic emergency and suspend Constitutionally protected rights such as free speech and  the right to bear arms.

And give the government the absolute authority to detain and arrest anyone who would interfere with the depopulation agenda.  To clear the way for the formation of a one world totalitarian dictatorship headed by the Globalists.

Conclusion: The WHO treaty is simply a smoke screen to hide the worldwide power grab and the elimination of opposition to the globalist agenda.