Margret Sanger was a figure who, at the beginning of the 20th century, created the organization known as Planned Parenthood. Not out of a desire to help the poor and disabled.
But rather as a way to help plan the act of Parenthood. But rather, as a way to rid society of those, she deemed undesirables such as the poor, disabled both physically and mentally. And to lower the black and people of color birth rates.
Sanger, a Eugenics supporter, was an avid supporter of Hitler and the Nazi parties Eugenics effort to create the master race in Germany. Hitler was a fan of Sangers’ efforts to lower the population by way of abortion and sterilization of the lower class and disabled.
Margaret Sanger was a prominent figure in the eugenics movement, which gained popularity in the early 20th century. Born in 1879, Sanger was a nurse and birth control activist who believed in the idea of improving the human race through selective breeding. She advocated for the use of contraception and reproductive rights, aiming to empower women and promote family planning. However, her association with the eugenics movement has been a subject of controversy.
The eugenics movement, rooted in the belief of improving the genetic quality of the human population, gained traction in the early 1900s. Proponents of eugenics believed that certain traits and characteristics could be inherited and passed on to future generations. They argued for the selective breeding of “desirable” individuals while discouraging reproduction among those deemed “undesirable.”
Margaret Sanger’s involvement in the eugenics movement was driven by her desire to address social and economic inequalities. She believed that by controlling reproduction, individuals could have a better chance at improving their lives and society as a whole. Sanger saw birth control as a means to prevent unwanted pregnancies, reduce poverty, and limit the population growth of those she considered disadvantaged.
Sanger’s advocacy for birth control faced significant opposition from religious institutions and conservative groups. However, her efforts led to the establishment of the American Birth Control League, which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Despite her contributions to women’s reproductive rights, Sanger’s association with eugenics has cast a shadow over her legacy.
Critics argue that Sanger’s support for eugenics reflects a troubling aspect of the movement. The eugenics movement has been widely criticized for its discriminatory practices, which targeted marginalized communities, including people of color, disabled individuals, and those with lower socioeconomic status. The forced sterilization of individuals deemed “unfit” by eugenicists has been a dark chapter in the history of the movement.
It is important to note that Sanger’s views on eugenics evolved over time. While she initially aligned herself with the eugenics movement, she later distanced herself from its more extreme and coercive practices. Sanger focused more on women’s reproductive rights and access to contraception rather than the selective breeding aspect of eugenics.
Today, the eugenics movement is widely discredited due to its association with racism, ableism, and violations of human rights. The unethical practices and discriminatory ideologies of the movement have led to its condemnation by the scientific community and society at large.
Conclusion: Margaret Sanger’s involvement in the eugenics movement was complex and controversial. While she advocated for reproductive rights and contraception, her association with eugenics raises ethical concerns. It is essential to critically examine the historical context and evolving perspectives when evaluating the legacy of individuals like Margaret Sanger and their contributions to social movements.
Sanger, in her own words, was a devout racist, a supporter of the Nazi extermination of what they viewed as undesirables. An adulterous woman who saw being a housewife as mundane and aborant. And being a mother as the lowest thing a woman could aspire to achieve.
And, according to her own words, considered worship of Jesus Christ as a complete waste of time to give consideration to a man crucified so long ago. She had contempt for all who believe in Christ.
She believed that her creation of Planned Parenthood was her contribution to the class struggle.
Though a lot of negative things have been ascribed to Sanger, most came directly from her own quotes in publications of the time. And her own writings.
Category: Eugenics
Eugenics at the end of the 19th century And In The 20th century
Eugenics, a term coined by Francis Galton in the late 19th century, is the study of improving the genetic composition of the human population through selective breeding and other interventions. At the end of the 19th century and throughout the 20th century, eugenics gained popularity as a scientific and social movement with proponents believing that the human race could be improved by controlling who had children.
In the late 19th century, eugenics was seen as a means to address social problems such as crime, poverty, and mental illness. Advocates argued that by controlling reproduction, society could rid itself of undesirable traits and promote characteristics deemed favorable. This belief led to the establishment of eugenics programs in several countries, including the United States, Germany, and Sweden.
One of the most notable figures in the history of eugenics was Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton’s work on heredity and human intelligence laid the groundwork for the eugenics movement. He believed that human qualities were inherited and that by encouraging the reproduction of individuals with desirable traits and discouraging those with undesirable traits, society could be improved.
The early 20th century saw a rise in eugenics advocacy, with organizations like the Eugenics Record Office in the United States and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics in Germany leading the way in research and policy development. These organizations collected data on family pedigrees, conducted research on hereditary traits, and lobbied for eugenic policies.
One of the most infamous examples of eugenics in the 20th century is the forced sterilization programs that took place in several countries, including the United States, Canada, and Sweden. These programs targeted individuals deemed “unfit” for reproduction, including people with mental illnesses, disabilities, and criminal backgrounds. By the mid-20th century, tens of thousands of individuals had been sterilized against their will in the name of eugenics.
The eugenics movement also had a significant impact on immigration policy in several countries. In the United States, for example, the Immigration Restriction League advocated for stricter immigration laws based on eugenic principles. The 1924 Immigration Act, which imposed racial quotas on immigrants, was influenced by eugenic ideas about preserving the genetic purity of the American population.
Despite its popularity in the early 20th century, eugenics fell out of favor after World War II due to its association with Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. The atrocities committed by the Nazis, including the forced sterilization and extermination of millions of people deemed “undesirable,” discredited eugenics as a legitimate scientific and social movement.
In the aftermath of World War II, many countries abandoned eugenic policies and laws, and the movement lost its mainstream support. Today, eugenics is widely regarded as a pseudoscience with dangerous implications for human rights and social justice. However, some of its ideas continue to influence debates on genetics, bioethics, and reproductive technologies.
Conclusion, eugenics was a prominent social and scientific movement at the end of the 19th century and throughout the 20th century. It aimed to improve the genetic quality of the human population through selective breeding and other interventions. Despite its initial popularity, eugenics fell out of favor after World War II due to its association with Nazi atrocities. Today, eugenics is considered a discredited and harmful pseudoscience with no place in modern society.
Eugenics was a scientific method to justify racism, and the idea of eliminating the poor, physically or mentally disabled. And the idea that the white race was the dominate or (master) race.
This type of thinking was also called Social Darwinism. Hitler used drew from the idea of Eugenics to create his idea of the creation of the blonde haired, blue eyed white master race.
Some notable supporters were Margret Sanger the founder of Planned Parenthood , Theodore Roosevelt and biologist
C.B. Davenport. Adolf Hitler was a avid supporter of Margret Sanger and Eugenics.
A Brief History of Communism In The 20th Century
Communism is an economic-political philosophy founded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 19th century. They wrote and published “The Communist Manifesto” in 1848, aiming to end capitalism, which they believed led to the exploitation of workers.
Marx and Engels envisioned a society where the means of production would belong to the entire community, abolishing all private ownership. Their slogan was that everyone would contribute according to their abilities and receive according to their needs.
Communist philosophy began to develop in Russia in the late 19th century, leading to the Bolsheviks seizing power through the October Revolution in 1917. They changed their name to the Communist Party and nationalized public property.
Joseph Stalin continued to lead the USSR with communist ideologies, extending the growth of communism in Russia and beyond. This example of communism influenced many countries, including China.
Communism as a political ideology advocates for state ownership of major resources in a society, aiming to eliminate the class system through equal redistribution of income and benefits of labor.
Karl Marx, known as the Father of Communism, proposed this ideology in his Communist Manifesto, emphasizing the importance of class struggle and critiquing capitalism’s instability.
The Communist Manifesto did not provide concrete instructions for setting up a communist government but influenced revolutionary industrial workers across Europe, leading to the rise of an international labor movement.
The early 19th century saw civil unrest in Europe as urban working-class individuals faced poor living conditions and saw stark inequalities between classes, fueling the appeal of communist ideas.
Marx envisioned communism as a global movement that would inspire and expedite working-class revolutions throughout the capitalist world, starting with the French revolutions of 1848.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 marked a significant turning point in the spread of communism, with the Bolsheviks establishing a communist government and nationalizing public properties.
The rise of the Soviet Union under Vladimir Lenin and later Joseph Stalin exemplified the application of communist ideologies on a large scale, shaping the economic and political landscape of the 20th century.
The Cold War between communist ideologies represented by the USSR and capitalist ideologies represented by the United States was a defining struggle of the 20th century, highlighting the tensions between the two systems.
Communism in China followed a similar trajectory, with the Communist Party gaining power and implementing communist policies to transform the economic structure of the country.
The principles of communism, including collective ownership of resources and equitable distribution of wealth, continue to shape political discourse and movements around the world.
The transition from capitalism to communism involves a process of class conflict and revolutionary struggle, with the goal of establishing a classless society where everyone’s needs are met.
The implementation of communism has varied in different countries, with some experiencing success in establishing socialist governments while others faced challenges in transitioning to a communist society.
The influence of communism extends beyond economic and social realms to cultural and philosophical domains, inspiring movements for social justice and equality.
Criticisms of communism often center on issues of individual freedom, state control, and economic inefficiencies, leading to debates about the feasibility and desirability of communist systems.
Despite its challenges and criticisms, communism remains a significant force in global politics and history, shaping the trajectory of nations and influencing ideological debates.
The history of communism reflects a complex interplay of ideas, movements, and historical events that have left a lasting impact on societies around the world, shaping the course of modern history.
Conclusion: This overview provides a glimpse into the rich and intricate history of communism, highlighting its evolution, challenges, and enduring relevance in the modern world.
Communism like Capitalism were two approaches to a social issue which gripped the world. The 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th centuries were plagued by massive poverty, starvation, and pestilence. This was due to overcrowding, poor living conditions and a scarcity of clean water, little food and unclean living conditions.
There were two distinct classes the wealthy and the poor. It was under these conditions that Socialism/Communism were born.
This was post feudal system, yet the wealthy saw them selves as aristocracy/noble born and the poor as nothing but slaves/the unwashed masses to be exploited for their enrichment.
They espoused Capitalism (Free Market Economy). Though it appeared free and to believe in individual liberty and personal property. The truth is that as long as you are wealthy, the system functions.
However, those who were in the lower class were little more than slaves. In the idea world Capitalism would have represented freedom. However, we live far from the ideal world.
Therefore, it was simply a change of definitions and titles. However, it was still the feudal system where the wealthy instead of having titles such as (Duke, Lord, Prince , or King was simply called Millionaires or later Billionaires).
Nothing in function had changed at all. In the middle 20th century, the middle class emerged, raising the working classes standard of living somewhat.
However, for the most part, nothing really has changed since the earlier eras. As such, capitalism could not fulfill its envisioned goals of universal financial freedom and the ownership of private property for all.
The wealthy maintained their domination of the majority of the wealth in society.
As such, it was out of this turmoil filled time that the idea of Socialism/Communism took root, especially among the lower working class.
As they struggled to eck out a meager existence working (slaving) in factories, in farms and on jobs owned by the wealthy.
Communism was the idea of communal property. Everything is owned not by a limited number of wealthy individuals. Rather, all property would be owned by all the people.
The Communist idea was this would be achieved through a people’s revolution. Where the workers would rise up and throw off the yolk of slavery to the wealthy and take back the means of creating their own destiny.
By doing this, give back all property to all the people instead of it being owned by a few at the top of society. With everybody receiving their fair share according to their need.
Again, in an ideal world, communal ownership and governance seem to be a good path to take. However, again, we don’t live in a. Ideal world.
How it played out in reality is the Communism became a weapon to be spread among the poor of a given country sewing the seeds of hope among the disenfranchised and lower class as a way for enemies to overthrow governments through violent revolution and uprisings.
Communism was also a failure, just like capitalism because both relied on this being an ideal world. And as we all are aware, we are far from living in an ideal world.
As such, due to greed, corruption, and psychopathic delusions of grandeur, the power hungry and opportunist used both ideologies to attempt world conquest leading to a very bloody and violent history spanning centuries.
Communism like Capitalism, was a failed ideology that led to nothing but misery and the death of millions of innocent people worldwide.
Assisted Suicide in America
This topic has been debated for a very long time as a moral dilemma. But is it really? I mean, I understand the concept of wanting to end your life in the case of a terminal illness. However, this has been applied to the elderly. And I could see how it could quickly be abused.
A man named Jack Kovorkian championed assisted euthanasia. However, it quickly got out of hand. He assisted 130 patients in committing suicide. He was later convicted of murder. Earning the moniker (Dr. Death).
This topic has heavy moral consequences. In that the chance it would be abused is very prevalent. With people deciding to use this idea for almost any reason, from depression to mental illness.
Not to mention the real chance that nefarious individuals could use this excuse to simply kill and eliminate those they wish to rid themselves of.
Further, it could be applied to those incapacitated, such as those in a coma or on life support, but with a DNR legal document .
There are other situations where this could be abused, such as accidental pregnancy due to rape. Mentally challenged individuals or even unwanted babies.
I believe this type of legislation is just another example of the Globalists through their lobbies pushing their depopulation agenda in a backdoor attempt to continue to cull the population further.
Conclusion: Ideas such as this have Eugenics fingerprints all over it. And reek of a Nazi legacy of eliminating the unwanted or lower echelon of society for the (Greater Good).
It’s not only immoral. But in my estimation, patently evil in intent and definitely in execution. The death penalty in most states has been repealed.
And, yet in this type of legislation, you want to condemn individuals to death, not for some heinous crime. But simply for existing. This is the definition of immoral and, in my estimation, evil personified.
Note: 20 states now support the idea of assisted suicide.
Conspiracies and The Paradigm Shift 