Albert Pike was a prominent figure in American Freemasonry and is often associated with his alleged predictions regarding the occurrence of three world wars.
While some believe that Pike accurately predicted the events of the two World Wars, it is important to approach these claims with caution as there is significant debate and controversy surrounding them.
According to the alleged predictions, Pike supposedly wrote a letter in 1871 outlining a plan for three global conflicts that would reshape the world.
It is important to note that the authenticity of this letter is disputed, and some researchers argue that it may have been a fabrication or misinterpretation.
In the alleged letter, Pike purportedly outlined that the first world war would be sparked by conflicts between different European nations, leading to the downfall of several empires and the establishment of communism in Russia.
This prediction is seen by some as mirroring the events of World War I and the subsequent Russian Revolution.
The second world war, as predicted by Pike, would allegedly involve a clash between fascism and communism.
This conflict would result in the rise of a totalitarian global government, according to the alleged predictions.
While aspects of this prediction can be seen in the events of World War II, it is important to note that the historical context and motivations behind the war were complex and cannot be solely attributed to Pike’s alleged predictions.
The alleged third world war, according to Pike’s supposed predictions, would involve a conflict between the Western world, led by the United States, and the Islamic world.
This conflict would result in widespread destruction and chaos, ultimately leading to the emergence of a new world order.
It is important to approach this prediction with skepticism, as the dynamics and causes of potential future conflicts are uncertain and subject to numerous factors.
It is crucial to recognize that the alleged predictions attributed to Albert Pike have been widely debated and questioned by historians and researchers.
Many argue that the interpretation of Pike’s writings and the subsequent attribution of these predictions to him are based on speculation and conspiracy theories.
While Albert Pike was undoubtedly a significant figure in American Freemasonry, it is important to critically examine any claims or assertions regarding his predictions on world wars.
Historians and scholars rely on verifiable evidence and rigorous analysis to understand the past and make predictions about the future, and it is essential to approach such claims with a critical mindset.
Conclusion: The alleged predictions attributed to Albert Pike regarding three world wars are a subject of debate and controversy.
While some see parallels between his supposed predictions and historical events, it is important to approach these claims with caution and critically evaluate the evidence and context surrounding them.
The study of history requires careful analysis and interpretation, and it is crucial to rely on verifiable sources and scholarly research when examining such claims.
Though there is some skeptism surrounding these predictions, what is important to understand is what this represents if genuine is evidence of how long and deep the globalist agenda truly is spanning decades if not centuries in the making.
Further, it demonstrates how interconnected all these groups and ideologies are and how they are being utilized as weapons of change to force the globalist end goals on the world.
It’s shows communism, radical Islam, and other ideologies are simply tools and means to an end to accomplish the globalists’ ultimate agenda of depopulation and the conquest of the planet.
Category: Slavery
A Question of Integrity
Question : What would possess a globalist banking entity to issue a warning to the Biden Administration?
Especially when it appears that the Biden Administration not only does whatever it’s told.
Why would Globalists, through an organization they own, tell Biden to stop his constant uncontrolled spending, especially when one of their objectives is to destroy the US economy?
Perhaps Biden has overstepped his globalist directives. It’s been apparent that both him and his family’s goals are to acquire as much money as possible.
Perhaps Bidens’ actions are rogue and unsanctioned by his globalist bosses. It has become obvious that the globalist elites have no love for Joe Biden.
Perhaps this warning coming so close in the wake of the NYT rebuke represents their displeasure for Biden and his recent problems that have been brought to light.
The continuation of both Joe Biden and his family’s pursuit of their own interests by way of supporting the Ukrainian war.
Simply for a reason of creating a situation that has the possibility of impropriety and money laundering is enough to gain the ire of the Globalist who allowed this conflict in the first place by their drawing attention not by doing what they said to do.
But by getting wealthy through it and again draw unwanted attention that the Globalist neither want nor condone.
Joe Biden may well have overstepped his authority and thereby draw attention to his actions and, by doing so, drew attention to the globalist agenda itself.
Which the Globalist have gone to a monumental effort to hide from the general population. Because, once the people see without a shadow of a doubt they are being manipulated, they will rebel.
Conclusion: As such, it appears the Globalists have been quietly at first and now with increasing regularity and more and more publicly.
Begun to addressing his improper behaviors with increasing occurrence. They may attempt to completely replace him before the upcoming election and replace him with someone more controllable and less self-serving.
Nudge Teams Are Being Utilized By Governments To Control The Public Through Psychological Warfare, Mind Control, and Propaganda
The governments around the world have been using (Nudge Units) to wage psychological warfare on the population to make them do what they want them to do.
This is done through subliminal programming, peer pressure, and social engineering, making their point of view appear the only choice.
Labeling all other perspectives as extreme, anti science, and even in some cases demonizing those viewpoints as well as those who hold those beliefs .
This tactic started decades ago covertly. However, during the covid era, they utilized teams to actively promote the government narratives and, in the time of the pandemic, even demonize and silenced top doctors in the field for stating the truth versus the government narratives.
Even if the government narratives ran counter to logic, science, or rational thought. For instance, banning people walking alone in forests, parks,beaches, or outdoor church services. While protests by far left groups were perfectly acceptable and allowed.
These Nudge groups are currently attacking anyone who would point out the fact that the Climate Change Scheme has no basis in hard science. But it is simply a method of wealth redistribution as well as control of the public.
They utilize front groups, protests, violence, public shaming, disinformation and misinformation as well as spokesmen that have no basis to speak on the topic except to use emotion as a way to control people’s perception as in their use of the school girl Greta Thumberg who had zero scientific background or credible data to back up her claims.
Since the executive orders signed by Barack Obama, propaganda was cleared to be used against the citizens in the governments quest to control the thought of the population. These Nudge units have been created and used to push the chosen narrative.
Conclusion: The creation and use of Nudge teams is a direct violation of the Constitution. Free speech is considered a liability to the overall globalist agenda. As such, every effort is being brought to bear to not only label any ideas that run counter to their narrative as (hate speech). This nebulous label can be utilized to demonize and shut down any opinion they deem counter to their overall goals.
These Nudge teams are nothing more than the modern day equivalent to the Nazi Grey shirts who terrorized the citizens and pushed the state narrative. Demonizing any idea that ran counter to that state narrative. And was actively used to curtail free speech as counter to the public good, therefore (hate speech).
The New York Times Leaves the Reservation To Attack Biden Over MSM Avoidance
New York Times Leaves The Reservation To Attack Biden Over MSM Avoidance
Recently the NYT made a statement regarding the avoidance of Biden to do interviews with the MSM on his policies and selling out of the country to the Globalist.
This call out of the administration is either a one-off or perhaps a whistle-blower taking a chance to say what everybody else already knows.
Or perhaps it’s a first step toward others standing up against the seditious activities of not only Biden but the Democratic Party as well.
It is also evident that a portion or possibly more of the Republican Party is also complict in there seditious support of the globalist agenda in opposition of the Constitution and freedom in general.
The NYT has been a supporter of the government narrative. As well as actively pushing wokism and the Marxist line.
Communism has been a tool again Western society that has been utilized for decades by the Globalists in their relentless March toward their ultimate goals of depopulation and world domination.
The NYT has, like most of the MSM, always pushed the far Left ideology and repeatedly supporting globalism over the countries they were reporting on this, including the NYT historically.
This is because most of the MSM both digital as well as hard copy is owned or directly controlled by billionaire Globalist elites. Which makes them simply mouthpieces of the Globalist propaganda narrative.
This negative attack on Biden is departure from the standard propaganda message. And as such is surprising in it occurrence. As well as the possible causes and ramifications of such a public accusation against Biden directly.
Which could signal a number of possible scenarios. Among which could be a lone disgruntled whistle-blower acting alone. Or the beginning of a rebellion of reporters, perhaps realizing the dire position our country is facing.
Or perhaps it’s a sign that the Globalists see Biden as a liability to their overall agenda and perhaps are going to malign him either to bring in a different front man to carry on their agenda.
Or even they see the people waking up to their betrayal and have decided to allow Trump to take office for 4 years to calm down the public. A public on the brink of violent revolution would run counter to their long-term plans.
The Globalist are not worried about short-term setbacks. They are playing the long game confident that given time, they will achieve their ultimate goals.
They just have to keep the population in the dark and pacified until they are ready to pull the trigger on they overall plans. They just need to keep the public in the dark and believe that their threat is nothing but a (conspiracy theory).
As long as the people believe they have a choice and freedom, then they won’t rebel. Even though their government no longer represents them nor has it for decades is irrelevant.
Their elections are bogus and rigged. Again irrelevant as long as they maintain the status quo until the moment they are ready to act. The public will never realize they are nothing but unknowing slaves that are not only not free at all but all expendable. Unaware sheep waiting on the slaughter.
Conclusion: The NYT attack against Biden, though it appears as the first light shone on the seditious activity of the president and his avoidance of true damage, his policies and corruption have wrought on the country.
This is at best suspect and, at worst, the first step to eliminate an asset that has ceased to be of use to his globalist masters.
A stand and watch mentality is needed to see where this action leads. Whether it takes root, among other reporters, across the MSM landscape is left to be seen.
Or was it a one-off done by a disgruntled rogue who will be silenced is left to be seen. One voice can be silenced. A million can not so easily be removed.
In this case, only time will tell the direction this first salvo against Biden will take. And whether it was an act of civil disobedience or the Globalists removing one puppet to replace him with another.
What happens if Joe Biden Declares A “Climate Emergency”?
It was reported recently that Joe Biden was close to declaring a ” Climate Emergency”. What would this mean for the US and its citizens?
If he does this, he will gain 100 war time powers similar to the covid crisis or 911. He will gain the ability to bypass Congress and implement the New Deal provisions unfettered.
Including climate lockdowns, closing businesses, parks, and churches and forced public changes similar to martial law.
He can implement wide-ranging changings like banning events, gatherings, and usage of things like internal combustion vehicles. Gas stoves as well as all coal energy production facilities.
He could commendeer land that people are living on as (Public Domain) and force people to move off their lands. Close private farms and even build ( Smart Cities called 15 minute cities which would basically restrict the usage of vehicles to 15 minutes a day and restrict movement the rest of the time in the name of Climate Change).
Such cities would be monitored 24/7 through video surveillance monitored by Ai.
He could restrict food usage and availability forcing a curtailment or massive reduction in meat production. Or implementation of forced usage of lab grown meat. As well as the usage of GMO vegetables and fruits.
Theorically he could demand control of your heating/cooling of your homes through smart thermostats and other smart devices giving the government the power to limit the usage and the power to shut them off when they deem its required.
It’s possible they may, through smart power meters and other systems, limit your power usage as well limiting your power usage daily, shutting it off when they deem it is required.
They could limit your access to specific businesses, services, and products, including firearms, emergency food, or medical supplies.
The movement restrictions, as in the days of the pandemic, could be reimplimented as well as possible change to digital currency in the interest of gaining control over your access to goods and services.
Further, in the interest of maintaining compliance to Climate Change directives, a social credit score could be implemented. And through which further restrict your movement by making non-compliance with Climate Change mandates carry a punishment of not being able to purchase gasoline, or ride public transit, or restrict air travel.
It could also restrict your access to the internet. Declaring the need for a digital ID to track all your usage and activities online limited your freedom of speech and further controlling your daily activities.
Conclusion: The declaration of a climate emergency is tantamount to declaring martial law and, in so doing, would suspend the Constitution and, for all intents and purposes, remove freedom from the population. You would become slaves to the state.
This, in my opinion, is simply one more step toward achievement of the globalist agenda of depopulation, eliminating the current society.
As well as destruction of the economy and sovereignty of the US. And, it has become obvious that the Democratic as well as much of the Republican parties no longer represent the people who elected them.
Therefore, their purpose is simply to create and implement the agenda of the world Globalist here in the US.
As such, declaring a climate emergency by the Biden Administration is simply a means to that end. And one more step to accomplishment of the Globalist stated goals.
Antisemitism: Folstered By The Globalist Elite
Since the onset of the current conflict between Isreal and Palestine in the West Bank, the occurrences of Antisemitism has been on the increase.
The question of whether this is a grassroots occurrence or something that was manufactured on purpose by the Globalists to foster further amity in the US and abroad to weaken social bonds as well as damage US sovereignty is unknown by suspect given their penchant for psychological operations as well as their fostering of propaganda.
It appears that through a combination of unfettered invasion by radical Islamic sympathizers and a push by Globalists Like Soros and Schwab they have fostered animosity toward Isreal and the Jews especially in the US on college campuses and at the Capital.
With their ongoing desire to eliminate the national sovereignties of all the countries of the West. It’s not surprising that they would utilize their stealth soldiers as a socially disruptive force against the Jewish people as the portrayal of them as the aggressor in the current conflict.
Whereas the current crisis there is not a war between peoples. Rather, it is a created conflict between governments that rather than an opposition that couldn’t find a peaceful resolution. Was a manufactured event created, planned, and orchestrated, not by the two governments.
It was planned and financed as a means to an end by the world’s globalist elite in a further effort to push forward their plan to cause further social disruption and a permanent elimination of national sovereignty.
Who are the victims of this manufactured event? Not the countries that staged the event. But rather, the innocent civilians who have been brutalized, raped, ravaged, and killed as well as displaced from their homes.
And why, you ask? Well, it is a cruel scheme to act as a smoke screen and catalyst for the narrative of forced immigrant migration.
A narrative they use to hide the movement of their UN , Brix treaty stealth soldiers into the Western countries to begin their assault on the economies, sovereignties and societies in preparation for their destruction to make way for the creation of the Globalist one world totalitarian government.
Conclusion: The current rash of antisemitism being folstered and put on display is being manufactured and utilized as simply one more act by the Globalists to destabilize, demoralize and hopefully destroy the social bonds of the Western countries in a bid to eliminate national sovereignties.
The Illuminati And It’s Connections To Other Secret Societies As Well As The Globalist Elite
The Illuminati, also known as the Bavarian Illuminati, was a secret society founded on May 1, 1776, by Adam Weishaupt, a professor of canon law in Bavaria, Germany.
Weishaupt founded the Illuminati with the goal of promoting Enlightenment ideals, including reason, secularism, and the separation of church and state.
The name “Illuminati” comes from the Latin word “illuminatus,” which means “enlightened.” Members of the Illuminati considered themselves enlightened thinkers who sought to spread knowledge and promote social change.
The Illuminati’s organizational structure was based on secret societies such as the Freemasons, with ranks, rituals, and symbols designed to create a sense of mystery and exclusivity.
The Illuminati’s goals included influencing political and social change, promoting equality and democracy, and combating religious influence in government and society.
In its early years, the Illuminati attracted influential members from various backgrounds, including intellectuals, politicians, and artists.
The Illuminati’s influence grew rapidly, spreading across Europe and attracting thousands of members from diverse social and cultural backgrounds.
The Illuminati’s secrecy and reputation for subversive activities led to fear and suspicion from governments and religious authorities, who viewed the society as a threat to their power and influence.
In 1785, the Bavarian government, under pressure from the Catholic Church and other conservative forces, banned the Illuminati and launched a campaign to suppress the society.
Despite the government’s efforts to dismantle the Illuminati, society continued to exist in secret, with some members going underground and others forming new secret societies inspired by its teachings.
Over the years, various conspiracy theories have emerged linking the Illuminati to world events, suggesting that the society continues to exert influence over governments, banks, and other institutions.
While the historical Illuminati ceased to exist as a formal organization in the late 18th century, its legacy lives on in popular culture and conspiracy theories that continue to fascinate and intrigue people around the world.
Some believe that the Illuminati’s influence can still be felt in contemporary society, with secret societies and shadowy elites allegedly pulling the strings behind the scenes.
Critics of conspiracy theories about the Illuminati argue that they are based on little evidence and contribute to a climate of fear, mistrust, and paranoia.
Despite the lack of concrete proof linking the Illuminati to world events, the society’s legacy of promoting Enlightenment ideals continues to resonate with those who value reason, liberty, and social progress.
The Illuminati remains a symbol of defiance against authority, a beacon of intellectual curiosity, and a reminder of the power of ideas to shape history and society.
Conclusion: The Illuminati’s origin and history are shrouded in mystery, myth, and controversy, making it a fascinating subject of study and speculation for centuries to come.
Though it was originally founded in 1776. The secret society existed long before that with connections to the nobility in Europe and elsewhere.
As well as purportedly being connected to other secret societies such as the Freemasons, Skull and Bones, as well as many Babylonian death Cults.
And, most of the leaders of the world are said to be secret members . As well as the world’s wealthy elite. Many Death and Demon worshipping, Cults as well as even cannibalistic Cults are said to be either directly connected or affiliated with the Illuminati in the modern era.
Though the Illuminati has maintained a low profile using front groups to represent its interests. Which in my opinion, are one and the same with the Globalist.
That is ultimately world depopulation and the creation of a one world totalitarian government. And enslavement of the population that survives the world culling.
The Reasons For The Fall Of The Roman Empire And The Parallels To The Current Day US
Barbarian Invasions: The constant invasions by various Germanic tribes such as the Visigoths, Vandals, and Ostrogoths weakened the empire’s ability to defend its borders effectively.
Weak Military: Over time, the Roman army became less disciplined and less effective, making it easier for invading forces to penetrate Roman territories.
Political Instability: The Roman Empire experienced frequent changes in leadership, with emperors often being assassinated or overthrown, leading to instability and power struggles.
Economic Decline: The empire faced economic challenges such as inflation, high taxes, and devaluation of currency, which weakened the economy and led to widespread poverty.
Social Decay: The gap between the rich and the poor widened, leading to social unrest and discontent among the lower classes.
Overexpansion: The Roman Empire grew too large to be effectively governed, leading to difficulties in maintaining control over distant territories.
Administrative Corruption: Corruption and bureaucracy within the Roman government led to inefficiency and mismanagement of resources.
Decline in Morale: The once proud and disciplined Roman citizens lost their sense of civic duty and became apathetic towards the state.
Religious Strife: Religious conflicts and sectarianism, particularly between paganism and Christianity, divided the empire and weakened its unity.
Military Overextension: The Roman Empire stretched its military resources thin by fighting wars on multiple fronts, leading to exhaustion and depletion of manpower.
Loss of Civic Virtue: The traditional Roman values of duty, honor, and civic responsibility eroded over time, leading to a decline in the strength of the empire.
Environmental Factors: Natural disasters such as droughts, plagues, and famines further weakened the empire’s stability and ability to recover from external threats.
Decline in Agriculture: The Roman Empire struggled with agricultural productivity due to soil exhaustion, leading to food shortages and economic hardship.
Decline of Trade: The disruption of trade routes and decline of commerce weakened the economy and deprived the empire of vital resources.
Cultural Decay: The decline of intellectual and artistic achievements in the Roman Empire reflected a broader decay in the empire’s vitality and creativity.
Military Reforms: The Roman military underwent significant reforms in response to the changing nature of warfare, but these reforms were not implemented effectively or efficiently.
Division of the Empire: The division of the Roman Empire into Western and Eastern halves weakened its overall unity and made it more vulnerable to external threats.
Leadership Failures: Weak and ineffective emperors failed to provide the strong leadership needed to address the challenges facing the empire.
Decline in Innovation: The Roman Empire saw a decline in technological and scientific innovation, which limited its ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
Inability to Adapt: Ultimately, the Roman Empire failed to adapt to the complex challenges it faced, leading to its gradual decline and eventual collapse.
Conclusion: As is evident about the parallels between the fall of Rome and the current situation in the US, the obvious similarities are startling. Almost point for point the the conditions that caused the end of the Roman empire and the modern day situations happening in the United States are identical.
It makes one wonder if these conditions were recreated on purpose to destroy the US as they did 2000 years ago in Rome.
The Globalist have the stated goal of eliminating all the current countries in favor of a one world totalitarian regime. As such, it is obvious the reasons for the current situations that are occurring in the US.
And proves the old adage : (If we do not learn from the lessons of the past, we are damned to repeat them).
Democrats Yet Again Betray The People And The Country
The Democrats were quick to defend the border of Ukraine. To the tune of billions a month in remediation. While refusing to defend or support this country or the Southern Border of the US.
The Democrats are quick to hand out massive amounts of month to defend almost any other country except the country they were elected to represent.
While the country has been invaded by over 7 million UN stealth soldiers hellbent on destroying the economy and eliminating national sovereignty.
The Democrats and Republicans for that matter, show a unified front of their uniparty by voting to send close the 90 billion to defend the borders of foreign countries over that of the US.
Each day they hand out millions in aid and comfort to the invading UN stealth soldiers instead of doing their elected duty to secure the Southern Border of the US against the onslaught pouring across the US/Mexican border.
Conclusion: In obvious acts of treason and sedition the uniparty in DC is busy printing and handing out billions to secure the Ukraine and Isreali borders while they veto the bill that would have done the same for our own border.
At this point, we must seriously ask the question : ( Who do the members of the uniparty in the House and Senate truly represent?). Because it is abundantly clear, it’s not the people of the US.
A Brief History of Communism In The 20th Century
Communism is an economic-political philosophy founded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 19th century. They wrote and published “The Communist Manifesto” in 1848, aiming to end capitalism, which they believed led to the exploitation of workers.
Marx and Engels envisioned a society where the means of production would belong to the entire community, abolishing all private ownership. Their slogan was that everyone would contribute according to their abilities and receive according to their needs.
Communist philosophy began to develop in Russia in the late 19th century, leading to the Bolsheviks seizing power through the October Revolution in 1917. They changed their name to the Communist Party and nationalized public property.
Joseph Stalin continued to lead the USSR with communist ideologies, extending the growth of communism in Russia and beyond. This example of communism influenced many countries, including China.
Communism as a political ideology advocates for state ownership of major resources in a society, aiming to eliminate the class system through equal redistribution of income and benefits of labor.
Karl Marx, known as the Father of Communism, proposed this ideology in his Communist Manifesto, emphasizing the importance of class struggle and critiquing capitalism’s instability.
The Communist Manifesto did not provide concrete instructions for setting up a communist government but influenced revolutionary industrial workers across Europe, leading to the rise of an international labor movement.
The early 19th century saw civil unrest in Europe as urban working-class individuals faced poor living conditions and saw stark inequalities between classes, fueling the appeal of communist ideas.
Marx envisioned communism as a global movement that would inspire and expedite working-class revolutions throughout the capitalist world, starting with the French revolutions of 1848.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 marked a significant turning point in the spread of communism, with the Bolsheviks establishing a communist government and nationalizing public properties.
The rise of the Soviet Union under Vladimir Lenin and later Joseph Stalin exemplified the application of communist ideologies on a large scale, shaping the economic and political landscape of the 20th century.
The Cold War between communist ideologies represented by the USSR and capitalist ideologies represented by the United States was a defining struggle of the 20th century, highlighting the tensions between the two systems.
Communism in China followed a similar trajectory, with the Communist Party gaining power and implementing communist policies to transform the economic structure of the country.
The principles of communism, including collective ownership of resources and equitable distribution of wealth, continue to shape political discourse and movements around the world.
The transition from capitalism to communism involves a process of class conflict and revolutionary struggle, with the goal of establishing a classless society where everyone’s needs are met.
The implementation of communism has varied in different countries, with some experiencing success in establishing socialist governments while others faced challenges in transitioning to a communist society.
The influence of communism extends beyond economic and social realms to cultural and philosophical domains, inspiring movements for social justice and equality.
Criticisms of communism often center on issues of individual freedom, state control, and economic inefficiencies, leading to debates about the feasibility and desirability of communist systems.
Despite its challenges and criticisms, communism remains a significant force in global politics and history, shaping the trajectory of nations and influencing ideological debates.
The history of communism reflects a complex interplay of ideas, movements, and historical events that have left a lasting impact on societies around the world, shaping the course of modern history.
Conclusion: This overview provides a glimpse into the rich and intricate history of communism, highlighting its evolution, challenges, and enduring relevance in the modern world.
Communism like Capitalism were two approaches to a social issue which gripped the world. The 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th centuries were plagued by massive poverty, starvation, and pestilence. This was due to overcrowding, poor living conditions and a scarcity of clean water, little food and unclean living conditions.
There were two distinct classes the wealthy and the poor. It was under these conditions that Socialism/Communism were born.
This was post feudal system, yet the wealthy saw them selves as aristocracy/noble born and the poor as nothing but slaves/the unwashed masses to be exploited for their enrichment.
They espoused Capitalism (Free Market Economy). Though it appeared free and to believe in individual liberty and personal property. The truth is that as long as you are wealthy, the system functions.
However, those who were in the lower class were little more than slaves. In the idea world Capitalism would have represented freedom. However, we live far from the ideal world.
Therefore, it was simply a change of definitions and titles. However, it was still the feudal system where the wealthy instead of having titles such as (Duke, Lord, Prince , or King was simply called Millionaires or later Billionaires).
Nothing in function had changed at all. In the middle 20th century, the middle class emerged, raising the working classes standard of living somewhat.
However, for the most part, nothing really has changed since the earlier eras. As such, capitalism could not fulfill its envisioned goals of universal financial freedom and the ownership of private property for all.
The wealthy maintained their domination of the majority of the wealth in society.
As such, it was out of this turmoil filled time that the idea of Socialism/Communism took root, especially among the lower working class.
As they struggled to eck out a meager existence working (slaving) in factories, in farms and on jobs owned by the wealthy.
Communism was the idea of communal property. Everything is owned not by a limited number of wealthy individuals. Rather, all property would be owned by all the people.
The Communist idea was this would be achieved through a people’s revolution. Where the workers would rise up and throw off the yolk of slavery to the wealthy and take back the means of creating their own destiny.
By doing this, give back all property to all the people instead of it being owned by a few at the top of society. With everybody receiving their fair share according to their need.
Again, in an ideal world, communal ownership and governance seem to be a good path to take. However, again, we don’t live in a. Ideal world.
How it played out in reality is the Communism became a weapon to be spread among the poor of a given country sewing the seeds of hope among the disenfranchised and lower class as a way for enemies to overthrow governments through violent revolution and uprisings.
Communism was also a failure, just like capitalism because both relied on this being an ideal world. And as we all are aware, we are far from living in an ideal world.
As such, due to greed, corruption, and psychopathic delusions of grandeur, the power hungry and opportunist used both ideologies to attempt world conquest leading to a very bloody and violent history spanning centuries.
Communism like Capitalism, was a failed ideology that led to nothing but misery and the death of millions of innocent people worldwide.
Conspiracies and The Paradigm Shift 