Current History And Science Is Less About Actual Factual Information And More About The Official Governmental Narrative

This is a complex and nuanced subject as the relationship between official historical narratives, scientific knowledge, and potential government influence or manipulation is a topic of ongoing debate and discussion.

Key points to consider on this topic:

1. Mainstream historical narratives:
  
– The history that is commonly taught in educational institutions and presented in mainstream sources is the result of extensive research, analysis, and scholarly consensus built up over time.
 
– Historians rely on a wide range of primary sources, archaeological evidence, and cross-referencing of information to construct their understanding of past events and developments.

2. Potential biases and limitations:
 
– It is important to acknowledge that historical narratives can be influenced by the perspectives, biases, and agendas of those who record and interpret the past.
 
– Governments, institutions, and dominant social groups may have incentives to promote certain historical narratives that align with their interests or maintain their power structures.

3. Ongoing historical revisions and debates:
 
– History is not a static or monolithic field; it is constantly being re-evaluated, challenged, and revised as new evidence emerges and different interpretations are proposed.
  
– Historians engage in ongoing debates and discussions about the accuracy, completeness, and interpretation of historical events and processes.

4. Scientific knowledge and its evolution:
 
– Similarly, scientific knowledge is not a fixed or infallible set of facts; it is a dynamic and evolving understanding of the natural world, based on empirical evidence and rigorous testing.
  
– Scientific theories and models can be revised or replaced as new discoveries and advancements are made.

5. Potential government influence and censorship:
  
– It is true that governments and powerful institutions can sometimes attempt to influence or censor certain historical narratives or scientific findings that may challenge their interests or official positions.
  
– However, the extent and effectiveness of such efforts are debated, and there are often mechanisms in place, such as academic freedom and peer review processes, that help to maintain the integrity of historical and scientific research.

Conclusion:  It is important to approach these questions with a critical and nuanced perspective.

While it is important to be aware of potential biases and the need for ongoing scrutiny and revision of historical and scientific knowledge, it is also crucial to rely on well-established, evidence-based sources and to be cautious about unsubstantiated conspiracy theories or claims of widespread fabrication.

The relationship between history, science, and government influence is complex and multifaceted, and it requires a balanced and informed approach to assess the reliability and accuracy of the information we encounter.

The fact is that history and science, like most everything you have been indoctrinated with from birth, is a fabrication.  Its purpose is not to present actual subjective facts and information.

It’s about maintaining control and making you belief the constructed reality they have created and taught you is the truth. 

It’s about maintaining the official political narrative.   Not to convey reality as it actually is.  It’s to keep you asleep and controlled. 

That is the purpose of the education they allow you to possess.  It’s not about the truth.  And in science, it’s to hide what is actually possible.

The purpose of it is to keep you in the illusion.